Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sokolov Yura <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2018-04-06 12:30:28
Message-ID: 7b386dcb-985b-c67a-c5b2-0b59ef01af84@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/3/18 18:05, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Currently we seem to have only two machines doing the cross-version
> upgrade checks, which might make it easier to rearrange anything if
> necessary.

I think we should think about making this even more general. We could
use some cross-version testing for pg_dump, psql, pg_basebackup,
pg_upgrade, logical replication, and so on. Ideally, we would be able
to run the whole test set against an older version somehow. Lots of
details omitted here, of course. ;-)

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2018-04-06 12:34:43 Re: Online enabling of checksums
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2018-04-06 12:29:58 Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP