From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Jose Luis Tallon <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Implement uuid_version() |
Date: | 2019-07-13 12:36:54 |
Message-ID: | 7ac17303-ee5b-0266-29db-a3ce3baa5283@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-07-13 08:08, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> About doc: I'd consider "generation" instead of "generating" as a
> secondary index term.
We do use the "-ing" form for other secondary index terms. It's useful
because the concatenation of primary and secondary term should usually
make a phrase of some sort. The alternative would be "generation of",
but that doesn't seem clearly better.
>> (There is also precedent for redirecting the extension function to the
>> internal one by changing the SQL-level function definition using CREATE
>> OR REPLACE FUNCTION ... LANGUAGE INTERNAL. But that seems more
>> complicated and would require a new extension version. It could maybe
>> be included if the extension version is changed for other reasons.)
>
> What about avoiding a redirection with something like:
>
> Datum (* const pg_random_uuid)(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) = gen_random_uuid;
That seems very confusing.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-07-13 12:44:13 | Re: initdb recommendations |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2019-07-13 11:34:22 | Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS) |