Re: Replication

From: Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com>
To: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication
Date: 2009-06-24 19:13:22
Message-ID: 7aa638e00906241213v1e1d0d63p2174afc633fcfd98@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

We need to stop this thread, you guys are making me want to ditch Postgres
and get Oracle (after taking out a second mortgage on my house that is)..

Mike

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> Craig Ringer wrote on 24.06.2009 04:07:
>
>> Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>>
>>> Mike Christensen wrote on 23.06.2009 19:37:
>>>
>>>> Does anyone actually have that (any node can go down and the others
>>>> still
>>>> replicate amongst themselves?)
>>>>
>>> I think this is what Oracle promises with their RAC technology.
>>>
>>
>> Isn't RAC a shared-storage cluster?
>>
>
> As far as I know it is also a cluster of servers which can even hand over
> the processing of a single statement "in-flight" if the node goes down that
> is current processing the statement.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bayless Kirtley 2009-06-24 19:21:37 Serious JDBC problem
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-06-24 19:09:09 Re: 8.4 RC1 on ubuntu 9.04 jaunty, problems after install