| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sanyo Moura <sanyo(dot)moura(at)tatic(dot)net>, jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |
| Date: | 2018-12-06 02:19:24 |
| Message-ID: | 7aa0268e-7fe7-bbda-119d-88a9dcbc189e@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On 2018/12/06 11:14, Amit Langote wrote:
> I ran the original unmodified query at [1] (the one that produces an empty
> plan due to all children being pruned) against the server built with
> patches I posted on the "speeding up planning with partitions" [2] thread
> and it finished in a jiffy.
Forgot to add the link for [2]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/21/1778/
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-12-06 02:28:46 | Re: error message when subscription target is a partitioned table |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-12-06 02:14:06 | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-12-06 04:50:39 | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-12-06 02:14:06 | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |