Re: Is it acceptable making COPY format extendable?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is it acceptable making COPY format extendable?
Date: 2024-04-25 07:59:18
Message-ID: 7a978dd2-371b-4d10-b58e-cb32ef7282fa@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25.04.24 06:53, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> I haven't got any reply since 2024-03-15:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20240315.173754.2049843193122381085.kou%40clear-code.com#07aefc636d8165204ddfba971dc9a490
> (I sent some pings.)
>
> So I called this status as "stalled".
>
> I'm not familiar with the PostgreSQL's development
> style. What should I do for this case? Should I just wait
> for a reply from others without doing anything?

PostgreSQL development is currently in feature freeze for PostgreSQL 17
(since April 8). So most participants will not be looking very closely
at development projects for releases beyond that. The next commitfest
for patches targeting PostgreSQL 18 is in July, and I see your patch
registered there. It's possible that your thread is not going to get
much attention until then.

So, in summary, you are doing everything right, you just have to be a
bit more patient right now. :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-04-25 08:03:11 Re: AIX support
Previous Message Richard Guo 2024-04-25 07:20:10 Re: Short-circuit sort_inner_and_outer if there are no mergejoin clauses