Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Davin Shearer <davin(at)apache(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO
Date: 2023-12-05 21:46:50
Message-ID: 7a60faf6-e7f1-419d-aee6-10a78ea2fe81@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 12/5/23 16:20, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2023-12-05 Tu 16:09, Joe Conway wrote:
>> On 12/5/23 16:02, Joe Conway wrote:
>>> On 12/5/23 15:55, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>> and in any other case (e.g. LINES) I can't see why you
>>>> would have them.
>>
>> Oh I didn't address this -- I saw examples in the interwebs of MSSQL
>> server I think [1] which had the non-array with commas import and
>> export style. It was not that tough to support and the code as written
>> already does it, so why not?
>
> That seems quite absurd, TBH. I know we've catered for some absurdity in
> the CSV code (much of it down to me), so maybe we need to be liberal in
> what we accept here too. IMNSHO, we should produce either a single JSON
> document (the ARRAY case) or a series of JSON documents, one per row
> (the LINES case).

So your preference would be to not allow the non-array-with-commas case
but if/when we implement COPY FROM we would accept that format? As in
Postel'a law ("be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you
accept from others")?

--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Davin Shearer 2023-12-05 23:45:24 Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-12-05 21:20:11 Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-12-05 21:56:33 Re: [PATCH] plpython function causes server panic
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-12-05 21:33:33 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum