From: | Walter Couto <Walter(dot)Couto(at)EMBARCADERO(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problem retrieving a numeric(38,0) value as SQL_NUMERIC_STRUCT if value needs to use all 16 SQLCHAR elements of the val array |
Date: | 2014-06-05 13:22:25 |
Message-ID: | 7FA4F9E5512F214C801E596ECD8790E066A7FCE4@ETNAMAIL01.embarcadero.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Hi Hiroshi,
This patch fixes the problem.
Regards,
Walter
-----Original Message-----
From: Hiroshi Inoue [mailto:inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:24 PM
To: Walter Couto; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ODBC] Problem retrieving a numeric(38,0) value as SQL_NUMERIC_STRUCT if value needs to use all 16 SQLCHAR elements of the val array
(2014/06/03 19:56), Walter Couto wrote:
> Yes I can
Thanks.
Please try the attached patch.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "Inoue, Hiroshi"
> Date:06/02/2014 11:47 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: Walter Couto ,pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Problem retrieving a numeric(38,0) value as
> SQL_NUMERIC_STRUCT if value needs to use all 16 SQLCHAR elements of
> the val array
>
> Hi Walter,
>
> Could you test a patch if I send it to you?
>
> regards,
> Hiroshi Inoue
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-06-05 13:38:27 | Re: Need new psqlODBC release to update OpenSSL again |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-06-05 13:19:56 | Need new psqlODBC release to update OpenSSL again |