Re: pg_restore performance on solaris 10/6

From: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore performance on solaris 10/6
Date: 2006-08-01 15:52:39
Message-ID: 7F885BFF-0153-4275-9F5F-137B72D7ABFC@khera.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Jul 31, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Thomas Burns wrote:

> our database literally takes 8 times longer on the x4200 as it does on
> OS X (the x4200 hardware should be considerably faster -- it has
> better

for a restore like this, bump up the value of checkpoint_segments to
some large value (I use 256 -- but I have a dedicated partition for
the pg_xlog directory which gets big).

also, the normal tuning of the shared memory settings apply. how
much RAM do you have and what kind of disks are you using?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message phazon 2006-08-01 16:19:29 prepare, execute & oids
Previous Message John Purser 2006-08-01 15:31:44 Re: Autovacuum help..