Re: Plans for 8.2?

From: "Mikael Carneholm" <Mikael(dot)Carneholm(at)WirelessCar(dot)com>
To: "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Plans for 8.2?
Date: 2006-01-13 14:15:06
Message-ID: 7F10D26ECFA1FB458B89C5B4B0D72C2B0A0231@sesrv12.wirelesscar.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>
>> Too bad - I think that will keep a lot of potential users from
>> evaluating Pg as a serious alternative. Good or bad, decide for
>> yourself :)

>Why on earth should that be?

Citing Baldur Norddahl (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-01/msg00597.php)

"I will also point out that none of the replication solutions have the same solid reputation as postgresql. As long the postgresql team will not endorse a replication solution, you can not expect people to put the same trust in these solutions as we put into postgresql itself."

/Mikael

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shawn Garbett 2006-01-13 14:27:46 Cube/Rollup/ and Connect by prior
Previous Message John DeSoi 2006-01-13 14:10:51 Re: PostgreSQL Top 10 Wishlist