>>
>> Too bad - I think that will keep a lot of potential users from
>> evaluating Pg as a serious alternative. Good or bad, decide for
>> yourself :)
>Why on earth should that be?
Citing Baldur Norddahl (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-01/msg00597.php)
"I will also point out that none of the replication solutions have the same solid reputation as postgresql. As long the postgresql team will not endorse a replication solution, you can not expect people to put the same trust in these solutions as we put into postgresql itself."
/Mikael