Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code

From: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>
To: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Date: 2008-12-13 13:13:50
Message-ID: 7EB9B03F-CDC0-4A2B-9EBD-81741502BB84@pointblue.com.pl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2008-12-13, at 13:07, Markus Wanner wrote:
>
>
> However, that is a marketing decision [1], which should not be mixed
> with the technical discussion here. Speaking of a "synchronous commit"
> is utterly misleading, because the commit itself is exactly the thing
> that's *not* synchronous.
>

> [1]: Some people like the term "virtually synchronous" for marketing
> purposes. That's at least half-ways technically correct.

Marketing people are virtually trustworthy, from my life experience.
If you ask me, this is just preposterous.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-12-13 13:34:42 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Previous Message Markus Wanner 2008-12-13 13:07:56 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code