Re: Postgres Benchmark Results

From: Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
Date: 2007-05-22 06:01:11
Message-ID: 7E69B3AD-27D1-4C84-9876-BBC00F7709DB@event-s.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Am 21.05.2007 um 23:51 schrieb Greg Smith:

> The standard pgbench transaction includes a select, an insert, and
> three updates.

I see. Didn't know that, but it makes sense.

> Unless you went out of your way to turn it off, your drive is
> caching writes; every Seagate SATA drive I've ever seen does by
> default. "1062 tps with 3-4 clients" just isn't possible with your
> hardware otherwise.

Btw: it wasn't my hardware in this test!

cug

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2007-05-22 06:14:15 Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
Previous Message Greg Smith 2007-05-22 05:51:40 Re: Postgres Benchmark Results