From: | François Beausoleil <francois(at)teksol(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | PGbouncer and batch vs real-time pools |
Date: | 2013-02-14 17:09:02 |
Message-ID: | 7D324F07-7473-453C-92A7-05A37D8E64E8@teksol.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello all,
From reading the PGbouncer configuration man page, PGbouncer creates a new pool on every DB + user pair. If I have two types of queries, long-lived batch reporting and fast PK lookups, then I should favor two pools. Both pools can hit the same database server.
I can configure pgbouncer like this:
[databases]
batch = host=127.0.0.1 port=5432 user=batch dbname=app pool_size=M
quick = host=127.0.0.1 port=5432 user=quick dbname=app pool_size=N
I believe the important user is the one pgbouncer uses to connect to the real PostgreSQL server. That user + dbname is what creates a new pool. The client's name (the one the app connects as) is irrelevant since I hard-code what user I want to use.
Did I read the configuration manual right? Any advice from people "familiar with the matter"?
Thanks!
François Beausoleil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cochise Ruhulessin | 2013-02-14 18:54:44 | Immutable functions, Exceptions and the Query Optimizer |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-02-14 17:03:21 | Re: Runtime variations during day |