Re: PostgreSQL 8.2.3

From: Alban Hertroys <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>
To: Jason <jason(dot)friess(at)lmco(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.2.3
Date: 2010-11-10 18:49:38
Message-ID: 7D286063-BD5D-404E-B397-F49F0F51B986@solfertje.student.utwente.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10 Nov 2010, at 18:30, Jason wrote:

> Thanks for the replies.
>
> Yes - we're aware that there are newer versions of PostgreSQL out there. If
> it were completely up to us we would be using 8.2.18 or even 8.4. The
> problem is - we need to install on a network that has a rather involved
> approval process for all software tools that are introduced. 8.2.3 was
> previously approved. Getting a newer version of PostgreSQL approved would
> probably take time that we do not have given the time-critical nature of our
> effort.

What happens if for some other piece of approved software a patch comes out? Do you need to approve the patched version of the software again or is it okay to apply it?

I think you may have made an error by getting specifically PG 8.2.3 approved. I think you should have tried to get 8.2 (without the minor version number) approved instead.
Also, now is probably a good time to start with getting 8.4 or even 9.0 approved, so that you can upgrade in the not too distant future.

Alban Hertroys

--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.

!DSPAM:737,4cdae95810261036690396!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Harris 2010-11-10 19:46:10 Re: Failed archive_command copy - number of attempts configurable?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-10 18:16:10 Re: PostgreSQL 8.2.3