From: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: restore dump to 8.19 |
Date: | 2007-07-13 22:04:08 |
Message-ID: | 7CC9FEB7-8B48-4C8D-BCFC-F3276E68E49B@decibel.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Jul 13, 2007, at 2:11 PM, mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de wrote:
> i tried to restore a dump from version 8.1.8 to 8.1.9 and i had in
> one table
> a value "1.7383389519587511e-310"
>
> i got the following error message:
>
> pg_restore: ERROR: type "double precision" value out of range:
> underflow
> CONTEXT: COPY gesamtpunktecache, line 925001, column
> gc_gesamtsiege: "1.7383389519587511e-310"
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] error returned by PQendcopy: ERROR:
> type "double
> precision" value out of range: underflow
> CONTEXT: COPY gesamtpunktecache, line 925001, column
> gc_gesamtsiege: "1.7383389519587511e-310"
>
> i tried to insert a value of "1.7383389519587511e-310" to a 8.18
> database but
> i didn't manage it (with the same error message). But in one of my
> databases
> i can select a value like this.
>
> very strange. i just wanted to told you just in case it is of any
> interest and
> maybe i can help with further informations.
Is this on *identical* hardware, and were the binaries built the
same? Floating point stuff is very hardware dependent, and may have
some dependencies on compiler, etc as well.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Francisco Reyes | 2007-07-14 00:10:33 | pg_dump vs schemas |
Previous Message | mljv | 2007-07-13 19:11:44 | restore dump to 8.19 |