From: | Matthias Schmidt <schmidtm(at)mock-software(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers] Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema |
Date: | 2005-01-31 18:11:10 |
Message-ID: | 7BF6C126-73B3-11D9-BB9E-000393AA75A0@mock-software.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi *,
I will start implementing this stuff based on this syntax:
GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN public TO phpuser;
GRANT SELECT ON NEW TABLES IN public TO phpuser;
so there are two seperate commands to use.
is everybody fine with this aproach?
cheers,
Matthias
PS.: Tom, shouldn't we mention the fact, that one can grant on views
and sequences as well in the documentation?
Am 29.01.2005 um 01:43 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> GRANT SELECT ON ALL, NEW TABLES IN public TO phpuser;
>> ... does both.
>
> Ah, I overlooked that part of your message. I think the above probably
> doesn't work in bison, but if not we could spell it like
>
> GRANT SELECT ON ALL AND NEW TABLES IN public TO phpuser;
>
> Or just make the user enter two commands for this case. Aside from
> syntactic simplicity, that might be a good idea anyway. The NEW TABLES
> case is *fundamentally* different from every other form of GRANT, in
> that it causes future actions. So it might be a wise idea from the
> standpoint of understandability to keep it as a separate command from
> the immediate-acting ALL TABLES.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthias Schmidt
Viehtriftstr. 49
67346 Speyer
GERMANY
Tel.: +49 6232 4867
Fax.: +49 6232 640089
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-01-31 18:18:17 | Re: [pgsql-hackers] Patent issues and 8.1 |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-01-31 18:07:00 | Re: [pgsql-hackers] Patent issues and 8.1 |