| From: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pabloa98 <pabloa98(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million) |
| Date: | 2020-03-21 17:02:41 |
| Message-ID: | 7B1364EB-7DE5-48E7-A85D-F849EAE569F7@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On Mar 21, 2020, at 10:47 AM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 3/20/20 8:13 PM, pabloa98 wrote:
>> Nothing I saw that said int could not become bigint.
>> My bad. The code cannot be a bigint. Or it could be a bigint between 1 to 99999999 :)
>
>
> Aah, that was the counter Peter was talking about. I missed that.
>
> As to below that is going to require more thought.
>
Still no word on the actual requirement. As someone who believes consecutive numbers on digital invoices is simply a mistaken interpretation of the paper based system, I suspect a similar error here. But again we haven’t really heard, far as I know. Something really fishy about 99999999.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2020-03-21 17:13:38 | Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million) |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2020-03-21 16:47:17 | Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million) |