| From: | Alban Hertroys <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | rod(at)iol(dot)ie |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Getting a sample data set. |
| Date: | 2011-01-19 00:04:02 |
| Message-ID: | 7AC89488-F327-4795-99A5-586207686AB3@solfertje.student.utwente.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 18 Jan 2011, at 23:03, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
>>> I suppose you meant particular? Yes, definitely. Although I'm sure
>>> some would find it peculiar as well :)
>>
>> Actually, "peculiar to" is perfectly correct here, though a bit
>> old-fashioned. According to my dictionary, it originally meant
>
> That's a phrase we use in this part of the world also.... or maybe it's
> just what I learnt from my mother. :-)
I can't really comment on that, I'm Dutch. English is but my second language. This usage of peculiar is just peculiar to me. But, I've learned something new from you guys, so thanks for that. I'll probably be pestering some British friends with it in the coming days :)
Talk about getting off-topic... I didn't get the impression anyone did mind though.
Alban Hertroys
--
Screwing up is an excellent way to attach something to the ceiling.
!DSPAM:737,4d362a8a11702229214598!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | raf | 2011-01-19 02:34:43 | Re: help understanding collation order |
| Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2011-01-18 22:03:52 | Re: Getting a sample data set. |