Re: DATE type output does not follow datestyle parameter

From: "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DATE type output does not follow datestyle parameter
Date: 2014-02-12 13:08:26
Message-ID: 7AB998D4A4074791B86ED175808639E3@maumau
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:22:47PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
>> So, my suggestion is to just add the following sentence right after
>> the above one.
>>
>> The Postgres style is an exception: the output of the date type is
>> either MM-DD-YYYY (e.g. 12-17-1997) or DD-MM-YYYY (e.g. 17-12-1997),
>> which is different from the date part of the output of the timestamp
>> type.
>>
>> Could you consider and add this to the manual?
>
> Yes, I will make the change unless someone objects.

Could you commit this if you feel okay? I'm sorry if I missed the modified
article in the devel doc.

Regards
MauMau

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Pflug 2014-02-12 13:42:44 Re: Memory ordering issue in LWLockRelease, WakeupWaiters, WALInsertSlotRelease
Previous Message MauMau 2014-02-12 13:04:23 Could you include bug fix for Windows ASLR issue in the next release?