Re: tiny documentation fix

> On 17 Feb 2020, at 10:42, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:55:46PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> I propose this small fix for 27.4. Progress Reporting:
>>
>> - all of its partitions are also recursively analyzed as also mentioned on
>> + all of its partitions are also recursively analyzed as also mentioned in
>> <xref linkend="sql-analyze"/>.
>>
>> Note the last word: "in" sounds more correct.
>
> What you are suggesting sounds much better to me than the original.
> Do others have comments or objections?

In my understanding, the difference comes from how the link is interpreted, is
the mention "on a webpage" or "in a section". Personally I prefer 'in' as it
works for the PDF docs as well as the web docs. In doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
there is similar instance where we've used "in <xref ..":

"As mentioned in <xref linkend="xact-serializable"/>, Serializable
transactions are just Repeatable Read transactions which add"

Changing as per the patch makes these consistent, so +1 on doing that.

cheers ./daniel