Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2025-02-24 14:48:13
Message-ID: 7A0D2EFB-C019-49C0-874B-81A8DAB98AC6@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 24 Feb 2025, at 15:41, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

> I notice that 001_server.pl contains this:
>
> if ($ENV{with_python} ne 'yes')
> {
> plan skip_all => 'OAuth tests require --with-python to run';
> }
>
> and various other things that insist on this. But I think all we should need is for Python to be present, whether or not we are building plpython.

Agreed. Right now the --with-python check is what runs PGAC_PATH_PYTHON but
maybe there is value in separating this going forward into a) have python; b)
have python and build plpython?

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-02-24 14:54:22 Re: Statistics Import and Export
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2025-02-24 14:41:12 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER