Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation

From: "Alistair Bayley" <alistair(at)abayley(dot)org>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Subject: Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation
Date: 2006-07-29 12:23:22
Message-ID: 79d7c4980607290523j6f9203ccy4b95c4395ea59d71@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Oh, you didn't say you were on Windows

I did, but it was buried in the first paragraph...

> Magnus, did you have a specific reason for choosing Europe/Dublin,
> or was it just alphabetically first? Europe/London looks at least
> marginally closer to what one would think "GMT" means:

Does it have to be a specific city? I'd rather it just chose GMT.

Alistair

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message upch44 2006-07-29 13:12:44 Sobre PGSQL y ANSI SQL 92
Previous Message Flemming Frandsen 2006-07-29 10:44:14 Re: Performance of the listen command