On Nov 18, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Did you have hot_standby enabled on all of those machines? Even on the
> 9.0.13 cluster?
Actually, it's a bit more complex than this:
1. We don't know about P0, the 9.0.13 machine. I assume it was, but it was managed elsewhere.
2. P1 never had hot_standby = 'on', as it was never intended to be a hot stand_by.
3. S1 did have hot_standby = 'on.
--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof(at)thebuild(dot)com