Sorry for the misnomer. :-D Thanks for answering my question so
quickly!
> "Christopher Nelson" <paradox(at)BBHC(dot)ORG> writes:
> > I'm developing a hobby OS and I'm looking into file systems. I've
> > thought about writing my own, and that appeals, but I'm also very
> > interested in the database-as-a-filesystem paradigm. It would be
nice
> > to not have to write all of the stuff that goes into the DBMS (e.g.
> > parsers, query schedulers, etc) myself.
>
> > So I was wondering what sort of filesystem requirements Postgre has.
>
> There are DB's you could use for this, but Postgres (not "Postgre",
> please, there is no such animal) isn't one of them :-(. We really
> assume we are sitting on top of a full-spec file system --- we want
> space management for variable-size files, robust storage of directory
> information, etc.
>
> Also, the things you typically expect to do with a filesystem, such as
> drop many-megabytes files into it without blinking, don't match up
very
> well with the stuff that's fast in Postgres.
>
> Bottom line is that it'd probably be doable, but it'd be a pain and
> probably not perform real well...
>
> regards, tom lane