| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: EOL for 7.4? |
| Date: | 2009-11-12 23:16:20 |
| Message-ID: | 79910d18d3a52af6b2dd503f7d31a960@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
>> needs significant preparation for them. Announcing an EOL early in time
>> would give them the required time before the version used disappears.
>
> So, should we announce it for June?
No, it should be longer. June is practically around the corner
as far as business planning is concerned. Make it a year. Since it's
mid November, why not just say 2011?
> And yes, i'm +1 for having a rule for EOL, like "5 versions are
> supported".
If we released on a consistent schedule, this *might* be possible.
But we don't, so we can't say something like this.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200911121815
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAkr8lykACgkQvJuQZxSWSsi6xACdHU7xKgsfG+/zE2StXp97mdjC
XGoAn3LvIjzh1RKmD9K0Zyrg9W3LuHxt
=jCVo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-11-12 23:23:40 | Re: EOL for 7.4? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-11-12 23:07:53 | Re: actualised funcs typmod patch |