| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com>, Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Report search_path value back to the client. |
| Date: | 2024-08-19 16:10:58 |
| Message-ID: | 798456d3-b8fb-4362-abdd-ef93f5c281d9@vondra.me |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/19/24 18:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> writes:
>> On 8/14/24 18:30, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
>>> Looks good to me.
>
>> Pushed, after rewording the commit message a bit.
>
> This patch does not appear to have updated any of the relevant
> documentation.
>
Oh, I haven't realized we explicitly list which parameters are reported.
I see there are two places in libpq.sgml and protocol.sgml that should
list search_path - will fix. I haven't found any other place in the docs
that would need an update, or did I miss something?
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-08-19 16:19:07 | Re: Report search_path value back to the client. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-08-19 16:10:17 | Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points |