From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Avoid open and lock the table Extendend Statistics (src/backend/commands/statscmds.c) |
Date: | 2022-02-13 22:59:13 |
Message-ID: | 79817e57-d670-8eb4-b3bc-0683f2688adc@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/13/22 22:43, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-02-13 18:21:38 -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> Why open and lock the table Extended Statistics if it is not the owner.
>> Check and return to avoid this.
>
> I was about to say that this opens up time-to-check-time-to-use type
> issues. But it's the wrong thing to lock to prevent those.
>
I doubt optimizing this is worth any effort - ALTER STATISTICS is rare,
not doing it with owner rights is even rarer.
> Having looked briefly at it, I don't understand what the locking scheme is?
> Shouldn't there be at least some locking against concurrent ALTERs and between
> ALTER and ANALYZE etc?
>
I don't recall the details of the discussion (if at all), but if you try
to do concurrent ALTER STATISTICS, that'll end up with:
ERROR: tuple concurrently updated
reported by CatalogTupleUpdate. AFAIK that's what we do for other object
types that don't have a relation that we might lock (e.g. try to co
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION).
ANALYZE reads the statistics from the catalog, so it should see the last
committed stattarget value, I think.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-02-13 23:22:49 | bailing out in tap tests nearly always a bad idea |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2022-02-13 22:57:24 | Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT |