Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: "alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, "a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru" <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early
Date: 2021-08-23 20:23:26
Message-ID: 797797CD-6580-4FCD-BB0F-1C0501198125@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/23/21, 12:55 PM, "alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Thanks. I've pushed this now to all live branches.

Thank you! I appreciate the thorough reviews. Should we make a new
thread for the streaming replication fix?

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org 2021-08-23 20:39:15 Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early
Previous Message David Fetter 2021-08-23 20:12:12 Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT