Re: "Cluster" means "tangle" for me

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Eckermann <jeckermann(at)verio(dot)net>
Cc: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Cluster" means "tangle" for me
Date: 2001-01-10 00:56:30
Message-ID: 7977.979088190@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jeff Eckermann <jeckermann(at)verio(dot)net> writes:
> I would appreciate any advice on getting out of this strange situation. My
> table now doesn't exist, but I can't recreate it either (at least under that
> name).

Hmm, was "dedcolo" a temp table? It looks like clustering a temp table
gets confused. (In current sources, it's still pretty broken: the
cluster succeeds, but the table is no longer temp afterwards ...
will try to fix this for 7.1.)

I'd suggest that you restart your session, then repeat the vacuum,
and for each table that you get "mdopen" notices about, create an
empty file by that name in the database directory. Then you'll be
able to drop that table.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tod McQuillin 2001-01-10 01:11:20 Re: Re: COPY error: pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly
Previous Message Jeff Eckermann 2001-01-10 00:25:38 "Cluster" means "tangle" for me