Re: WIP: explain analyze with 'rows' but not timing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: explain analyze with 'rows' but not timing
Date: 2011-12-23 21:22:01
Message-ID: 7969.1324675321@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> writes:
> The motivation for this patch was that collection timing data often
> causes performance issues and in some cases it's not needed. But is this
> true for row counts?

Perhaps more to the point, is there a use case for collecting timing
data without row counts? I find it hard to visualize a valid reason.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-12-23 21:36:11 Re: patch: bytea_agg
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-12-23 21:19:57 Re: patch: bytea_agg