Re: Improving the isolationtester: fewer failures, less delay

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improving the isolationtester: fewer failures, less delay
Date: 2021-06-16 19:47:56
Message-ID: 795616.1623872876@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> [ assorted review comments ]

Here's a v3 responding to your comments, plus some other cleanup:

* don't use C99-style declarations-in-for, to ease planned backpatch

* make use of (*) annotation in multiple-cic.spec, to get rid of
the need for a variant expected-file for it

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
improve-isolationtester-3.patch text/x-diff 160.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-06-16 19:52:47 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-06-16 19:42:57 Re: Improving isolationtester's data output