Re: table configuration tweak for performance gain.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: "Harvey, Allan AC" <HarveyA(at)OneSteel(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: table configuration tweak for performance gain.
Date: 2004-11-15 15:26:05
Message-ID: 7954.1100532365@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 04:25:59PM +1100, Harvey, Allan AC wrote:
>> I created an index on the dt column, ran ANALYSE then,
>> EXPLAIN for some queries.
>> The returned plan was always sequential search.

> Could you post a query and the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output? We could
> probably give better advice if we could see what's happening.

Also, let's see EXPLAIN ANALYZE results after setting enable_seqscan to
OFF. If that doesn't force it into an indexscan, then you have got
more fundamental issues (perhaps a datatype mismatch). Note that I
don't recommend turning off enable_seqscan as a production solution;
but it's a useful tool for debugging.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Taber, Mark 2004-11-15 15:52:12 I'm sure a good time was had by many...
Previous Message Sim Zacks 2004-11-15 13:58:12 Re: Data from Internet direct into PostgeSQL Database??