From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Rich Ryan" <rich(at)usedcars(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Index Ops supporting money type |
Date: | 2000-10-19 05:40:54 |
Message-ID: | 7916.971934054@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Rich Ryan" <rich(at)usedcars(dot)com> writes:
> Does anyone know if there is an operator class that supports the money data
> type?
There is not.
Type money is on its way out anyway, at least in its current
incarnation, because it's (a) nonstandard, (b) doesn't support
a reasonable number of digits, and (c) isn't internationalizable.
While (a) is not a fatal objection, (b) and (c) mean the type is
pretty badly crippled.
I doubt that anyone will want to do any work on money in its present
form. Sooner or later it ought to be reimplemented as an I/O skin
on type "numeric" ... hopefully with decent locale support. In the
meantime, efforts like adding index support seem like throwing good
work after bad.
I suggest using type numeric for now.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 2000-10-19 05:51:22 | Re: time stops within transaction |
Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 2000-10-19 05:13:18 | Re: SetQuerySnapshot() for utility statements |