From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Error messages --- now that we've got it, do you like |
Date: | 2003-07-31 15:31:26 |
Message-ID: | 7916.1059665486@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Alvaro Herrera Munoz wrote:
>> Well, if this needs a vote, I'm for something like maximum/default/minimum
>> rather than the way it currently is. Saying "verbosity verbose" or
>> "verbosity terse" doesn't feel right, while "verbosity maximum" makes
>> sense, to me anyway.
"max" would work for the verbose mode, since that corresponds to all
available fields. It's quite unclear what "min" is though; the fields
included by "terse" are more of a judgment call (wasn't there someone
asking for only the SQLSTATE?). off/full would have the same problem.
> That was my feeling. Also, I was concerned that non-native English
> speakers might not have heard of 'terse', while max/min or off/full
> would be more common.
Non-native speakers would probably have to consult the man page to
remember the correct spelling of VERBOSITY anyway :-(
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-07-31 16:43:32 | Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-07-31 15:19:31 | Re: Error messages --- now that we've got it, do you like |