Re: GiST VACUUM

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Костя Кузнецов <chapaev28(at)ya(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: GiST VACUUM
Date: 2019-06-27 13:12:29
Message-ID: 78F49EB5-1F5D-4C93-882C-88BBB1C2631F@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 27 июня 2019 г., в 16:38, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> написал(а):
>
> I haven't done any testing on this yet. Andrey, would you happen to have an environment ready to test this?

Thanks!

I will do some testing this evening (UTC+5). But I'm not sure I can reliably test wraparound of xids...
I will try to break code with usual setup which we used to stress vacuum with deletes and inserts.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message didier 2019-06-27 13:54:28 Re: PG 11 JIT deform failure
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2019-06-27 11:53:52 Re: Obsolete comment in commands/analyze.c