| From: | "Bucky Jordan" <bjordan(at)lumeta(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: availability of SATA vendors |
| Date: | 2006-11-22 21:35:37 |
| Message-ID: | 78ED28FACE63744386D68D8A9D1CF5D420A0A1@MAIL.corp.lumeta.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>
> I could only find the 6 disk RAID5 numbers in the archives that were
run
> with
> bonnie++1.03. Have you run the RAID10 tests since? Did you settle on
6
> disk
> RAID5 or 2xRAID1 + 4XRAID10?
>
Unfortunately most of the tests were run with bonnie 1.9 since they were
before I realized that people didn't use the latest version. If I get
the chance to run additional tests, I'll post bonnie++ 1.03 numbers.
We ended up going with 6xRaid5 since we need as much storage as we can
get at the moment.
While I'm at it, if I have time I'll run pgbench with pg_log on a
separate RAID1, and one with it on a RAID10x6, but I don't know how
useful those results will be.
Thanks,
Bucky
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2006-11-22 21:47:56 | Re: availability of SATA vendors |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-11-22 17:34:23 | Re: availability of SATA vendors |