Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to clean out pg_init_privs grants

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to clean out pg_init_privs grants
Date: 2024-04-06 07:22:02
Message-ID: 78CCD91B-99DC-4B0F-B65E-AD46E67CBC0B@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 6 Apr 2024, at 01:10, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> (So now I'm wondering why *only* copperhead has shown this so far.
> Are our other cross-version-upgrade testing animals AWOL?)

Clicking around searching for Xversion animals I didn't spot any, but without
access to the database it's nontrivial to know which animal does what.

> I doubt this is something we'll have fixed by Monday, so I will
> go add an open item for it.

+1. Having opened the can of worms I'll have a look at it next week.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-04-06 10:16:58 Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-04-06 07:12:01 Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?