From: | Richard Yen <richyen(at)iparadigms(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: coalesce seems to give strange results |
Date: | 2010-07-15 00:21:18 |
Message-ID: | 789F51C8-08B5-40C1-A422-050EFAD84902@iparadigms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ah, I see what you mean. If there's no rows to return, then there's no coalesce-ing to do...
sorry for the spam.
--Richard
On Jul 14, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 15 July 2010 00:52, Richard Yen <richyen(at)iparadigms(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Looks like I'm encountering some quirks with coalesce()...
>>
>>> postgres=# select coalesce(null,0);
>>> coalesce
>>> ----------
>>> 0
>>> (1 row)
>>>
>>> postgres=# SELECT COALESCE(ROUND(EXTRACT(epoch FROM now()-query_start)),0) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE current_query = '<IDLE> in transaction';
>>> coalesce
>>> ----------
>>> (0 rows)
>>>
>>> postgres=# select version();
>>> version
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> PostgreSQL 8.4.2 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44), 64-bit
>>> (1 row)
>>
>> Any ideas?
>> --Richard
>> --
>
>
> I don't see what you mean. The query can't return any rows because
> none match the criterion specified. If you'd normally get 0 rows if
> using SELECT *, then adding in coalesce isn't going to force a result
> as there's nothing to select against.
>
> postgres=# SELECT COALESCE(NULL,0) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE
> current_query = '<IDLE> in transaction'; coalesce
> ----------
> (0 rows)
>
> postgres=# select coalesce(null,0) from pg_database where 1 = 2;
> coalesce
> ----------
> (0 rows)
>
> Thom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2010-07-15 01:05:23 | Re: Planner features, discussion |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-07-15 00:12:07 | Re: coalesce seems to give strange results |