From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: --with-tcl build on AIX (and others) fails |
Date: | 2002-01-09 17:05:45 |
Message-ID: | 7892.1010595945@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> This leaves the question how many port testers actually built
> and tested --with-tcl and actually tried a load and pg_connect in tclsh.
> My guess is not too many.
Good point.
> Imho we should start to require port reports to contain certain --with
> features, like perl, tcl, ....
Yes, it'd be nice to ask people to check those things. However if
someone doesn't have Tcl installed, I'm not going to reject the
port report...
> pgtclsh does work, but the shlib with above Makefile cannot be loaded
> by tclsh because it misses a -bnoentry flag :-(
> With -bnoentry it does load and pg_connect and pg_exec and pg_result,
> is this a sufficient test ?
I think so.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2002-01-09 17:07:52 | Re: Time as keyword |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2002-01-09 17:00:09 | Re: --with-tcl build on AIX (and others) fails |