From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Anthony Bykov <a(dot)bykov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Jsonb transform for pl/python |
Date: | 2018-06-27 16:58:19 |
Message-ID: | 786ad675-29c5-5acb-9d87-c3609689bf7d@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/23/18 01:44, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
> We are simply trying first to convert numeric to int64 if is does not have
> digits after the decimal point, and then construct Python Int instead of
> Decimal. Standard Python json.loads() does the same for exact integers.
We just had a very similar but not identical discussion in the thread
about the PL/Perl transforms, where we rejected the proposal. Other
comments on this one?
In any case, this might well be a consideration for PG12, not a bug in
the existing implementation.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gilles Darold | 2018-06-27 17:15:54 | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-06-27 16:55:28 | Re: SCRAM with channel binding downgrade attack |