Re: could not accept SSL connection: Success

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Carla Iriberri <ciriberri(at)salesforce(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: could not accept SSL connection: Success
Date: 2022-01-20 01:06:30
Message-ID: 785604.1642640790@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> Leaving things in their current state is fine by me. Would it be
> better to add a note about the business with 3.0 though?

What do you envision saying? "We don't need to do anything here
for 3.0" doesn't seem helpful.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-01-20 04:32:45 Re: could not accept SSL connection: Success
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-01-20 01:01:58 Re: could not accept SSL connection: Success