| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
| Date: | 2008-12-03 14:35:33 |
| Message-ID: | 7855.1228314933@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> If we do this though it would be really nice to do it at a higher
> level than the indexam. If we could do it for any indexam that
> provides a kind of bulk insert method that would be great.
> I'm just not sure how to support all the indexable operators for the
> various indexams on the local buffered list.
In principle, just return all those TIDs marked "lossy, please recheck".
This is a bit brute-force but I'm not sure any useful optimization is
possible.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2008-12-03 14:42:56 | Re: tuplestore potential performance problem |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-12-03 14:33:00 | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-12-03 16:40:17 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2008-12-03 09:40:07 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |