From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken |
Date: | 2008-04-02 21:34:39 |
Message-ID: | 782C8576F6012FB3DD150BAB@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:33:24 -0400 Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2008 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
>> > Agreed ... but, stupid question here ... if our tags are wrong in CVS, are
>> > the 7.1.x releases themselves wrong too? When I do a release tarball, I
>> > run:
>> >
>> > cvs -q export -rREL7_1_1 pgsql
>>
>> I believe we moved to using cvs export many years after 7.1. Before that,
>> the releases were made straight out of a cvs checkout. With cvs export it
>> is of course nearly impossible to create such a mess.
>
> Hmm, if we use a CVS export, why do we have, on "make distdir", the
> business to remove CVS files?
Using export was a relatively recent change ... wasn't a command I knew about
at the start, someone (possibly Peter) pointed it out to me and we changed the
script ... never thought to change distdir though ...
- --
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFH8/vv4QvfyHIvDvMRAu2NAKDjiCnjJfJ3pXtUX9PFH8vZfSnr5ACfcWdg
EiNTuC6bd2PFxlZ1tt8oA68=
=VbGW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-04-02 21:35:52 | Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-04-02 21:17:59 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |