Re: ICU integration

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ICU integration
Date: 2016-09-06 15:41:08
Message-ID: 781480a9-10d3-04d4-ca7d-244bf80e1e08@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/31/16 1:32 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> ICU is happy to have multiple versions
> of a collation at a time, and you'll probably retain the old collation
> version in ICU.
>
> Even if your old collation version isn't available in a new ICU
> release (which I think is unlikely in practice)

I think this is wrong, or I have misunderstood the ICU documentation.
There is no way to "choose" a collation version. You can only record
the one you have gotten and check that you get the same one next time.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2016-09-06 15:47:42 Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-09-06 15:40:34 Re: Bug in 9.6 tuplesort batch memory growth logic