Re: Confusion and Questions about blocks read

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail))" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confusion and Questions about blocks read
Date: 2006-09-22 16:24:35
Message-ID: 780.1158942275@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Home come the query statistics showed that 229066 blocks where read given
> that all the blocks in all the tables put together only total 122968?

You forgot to count the indexes. Also, the use of indexscans in the
mergejoins probably causes multiple re-reads of some table blocks,
depending on just what the physical ordering of the rows is.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Turner 2006-09-22 17:13:41 Re: Confusion and Questions about blocks read
Previous Message Alex Turner 2006-09-22 15:34:58 Confusion and Questions about blocks read