Re: psycopg3 transactions

From: Paolo De Stefani <paolo(at)paolodestefani(dot)it>
To: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Psycopg <psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psycopg3 transactions
Date: 2021-10-15 20:59:38
Message-ID: 77e106b39df5f9ce6fe30c4e7be2263e@paolodestefani.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: psycopg

It seems much clearer to me now
This makes me think that maybe it's worth trying to use an autocommit
connection...

Il 15/10/2021 12:56 Daniele Varrazzo ha scritto:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 19:28, Daniele Varrazzo
> <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Pretty much everyone comes from psycopg2, so we should definitely
>> improve the docs :D
>
> I have expanded the documentation about transaction behaviour.
> Feedback is welcome.
>
> https://www.psycopg.org/psycopg3/docs/basic/transactions.html
>
> Paolo, Daniel: I am especially keen to have your feedback as one
> newcomer and the other pretty much the authority in transaction
> management :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Daniele

--
Paolo De Stefani

In response to

Responses

Browse psycopg by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Fortunov 2021-10-15 21:43:37 Re: psycopg3 transactions
Previous Message Daniele Varrazzo 2021-10-15 10:56:25 Re: psycopg3 transactions