Re: pg_restore new option -m

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore new option -m
Date: 2009-02-19 15:05:32
Message-ID: 7751.1235055932@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr writes:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You sure you don't get exactly the same without -m?
>>
> yes!

We're going to need to see the test case then.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-02-19 15:07:03 Re: pg_restore new option -m
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-02-19 15:00:30 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Start background writer during archive recovery.