Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
Date: 1999-07-20 21:49:26
Message-ID: 775.932507366@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Removed:
> * Be smarter about promoting types when UNION merges different data types
> * SELECT ... UNION ... GROUP BY fails if column types disagree
> * INSERT ... SELECT ... UNION is not reliable

> And added:

> * redesign INSERT ... SELECT to have two levels of target list

Er ... wait. The first two of those TODO items were separate issues.
I think they can be fixed without changing the querytree representation.
The third can be superseded by this item, though.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-20 23:05:12 Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-20 21:40:17 Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation