Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date: 2001-08-16 03:32:42
Message-ID: 7749.997932762@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> BTW, a protocol version bump for this is a horrid idea. That will
>> create lots of compatibility problems for people, whether they use
>> the new auth mode or not.

> I thought protocol bumps were the way to handle such things. The SCM
> patch does it as well. How should I tell if I am talking to a >=7.2
> client?

You send it the new auth request code and see if it copes or not.
There's no need to bump the overall protocol version, and every reason
*not* to.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-16 03:43:55 Re: patch for 60 seconds bug
Previous Message Joseph Shraibman 2001-08-16 02:20:28 patch for 60 seconds bug