Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(dot)wheeler(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Date: 2010-02-25 19:20:10
Message-ID: 7744.1267125610@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 3) patch postgres to fix the recursive issue (What I'm leaning towards)
> [ fixes both issues ]

How exactly would you propose doing that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-02-25 19:29:33 Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-02-25 19:08:42 Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)