| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Muhammad Ikram <mmikram(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17 |
| Date: | 2024-06-22 14:43:53 |
| Message-ID: | 771727.1719067433@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> FYI, changing this GUC name could force an initdb because
> postgresql.conf would have the old name and removing the comment to
> change it would cause an error. Therefore, we should change it ASAP.
That's not reason for a forced initdb IMO. It's easily fixed by
hand.
At this point we're into the release freeze for beta2, so even
if we had consensus on a new name it should wait till after.
So I see no particular urgency to make a decision.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2024-06-22 14:53:31 | Re: FreezeLimit underflows in pg14 and 15 causing incorrect behavior in heap_prepare_freeze_tuple |
| Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2024-06-22 14:42:50 | Re: FreezeLimit underflows in pg14 and 15 causing incorrect behavior in heap_prepare_freeze_tuple |